Here it is... I'm sorry I never watched it. There happy?!
By , at 4:56 AM
No, not really.
By , at 11:18 AM
Apologize for not updating the cast page now!
UPDATE THE CAST PAGE!!!!!!!
By , at 12:56 PM
Everyone's an idiot anyway. Why does it matter? Does the stupidity of the president really matter in the long run? Does anyone's stupidity really matter to anyone?
No. Get over yourselves.
By , at 2:41 PM
If that were the case, then the CAST PAGE doesn't even matter.
That I cannot accept.
By , at 2:53 PM
Sigh, and I used to be able to block it all out with a Liberal PM in power, now that Stephen harper is in power Canada will truly become America Jr.
By , at 8:33 PM
This is scary. I see "Red Dawn" coming.
By , at 8:36 PM
Can no one comment on the political climate without resorting to attacking the mental state or intelligence of someone who disagrees. Doing that is an ad hominum logic flaw, and just weaken your own argument, learn 2 play people, learn 2 play.
By , at 9:10 PM
Its all a game people, and we're stupid for allowing ourselves for being pawns in it.
By , at 8:59 AM
"This is scary. I see "Red Dawn" coming."
Yeah that damn Soviet Union is so up in our grill.
Also, you really think our public high schools put out kids like that anymore? We're lucky they can count their change, most of 'em.
By , at 4:07 AM
""This is scary. I see "Red Dawn" coming.""
"Yeah that damn Soviet Union is so up in our grill. Also, you really think our public high schools put out kids like that anymore? We're lucky they can count their change, most of 'em."
You're focusing on the wrong part of the movie. What's scary is any country or countries being able to get in and attack us from the inside.
By , at 7:08 AM
For me... As for apologizing... I quote The Matrix. "How about, I flip you the bird, and you give me my phone call?"
I don't know why I would need a phone call, but there you have it. Fuck no I'm not apologizing; Even if Bush is doing something stupid (Which, I thought that liberals didn't want us to judge people based on religion or race or nationality? Silly me.), that doesn't keep Moore from being a creep and an anti-American.
By , at 10:43 AM
I never watched it either, nor did I ever think that Moore was being treasonous. Back then I figured he wasn't accurate (an opinion which has fluctuated from time to time), but I wouldn't accuse him of TREASON.
I'm sorry that all of us with a hint of right-wing are a bunch of failures at life, apparently. 'Cause apparently there's NO WAY IN THE WORLD that some of us "rethuglicans" could actually be open-minded. No way, no sir.
(...okay, sorry for a ranty post this time around. I'm much calmer about things, usually. Trust me, I'll be good from now on.)
-Oddysey
By , at 11:21 AM
I apologize on behalf of conservatives; since all liberals are afraid of muslims, eh? I suppose you'd be this afraid if it had been an egyptian company as well?
No! We absolutely cannot have allies in the middle east! They`re all muslim! And Muslims are dangerous! Right? Yeah, put those in your liberal talking points...
By , at 1:34 PM
I love how all these political statements are posted by "anonymous". Too afraid to put any shadow of a face behind your opinion?
By , at 5:08 PM
Am I the only one that realizes that calling the president on his bullshit is not anti-Americanism or un-American. Freedom of speech and expression anyone? Patriotism is not expressed towards a person with a title, but towards the ideals for which America is SUPPOSED to stand. Verbally attacking an elected president who betrays those ideals is not an act of anti-Americanism: You're calling an abhorrent, senseless piece of shit on his bullshit. It's called accountability, people, and even those at the highest levels of elected government should not be above it.
Michael Moore? I'll stop short of calling him a prophet, thanks. The truth is that the people have been played against themselves, and it has allowed arguably the worst presidential administration in American history to get away with damn near anything.
Oh, yes, on the new Conservative PM Stephen Harper. The one thing he had time to promise and delivered on was more child care services in Canada. However, now that legislation will be gone in March of next year, eliminating 7000 child care positions nation-wide. 'Stand Up For Canada' indeed...
Always assume nothing.
Always question everything.
Always believe in something,
just not me.
- Infamous 370
By , at 8:18 AM
>> I love how all these political statements are posted by "anonymous". Too afraid to put any shadow of a face behind your opinion?
A face? Should we be putting our home addresses and daytime phonenumbers up too? While I`m at it, I`ll give ya my SS# and my date of birth, and here's a picture of my dog Mickey, and a short background history of my family for the past 100 years.
By , at 2:49 PM
>>A face? Should we be putting our home addresses and daytime phonenumbers up too? While I`m at it, I`ll give ya my SS# and my date of birth, and here's a picture of my dog Mickey, and a short background history of my family for the past 100 years.
thats blowing things out of proportion you dipshit, of course when you idiots do things like that you can make anything look bad. NO WONDER ALL THIS GOOFY SHIT IS GOING ON!!!!
maybe if u people would stay in your homes and let the smart people do the talking for once crap like this wouldn't occur then there would be no need to give apoligies because you retards would finally have enough sense to keep your damn mouths shut while the people who know what they're talking about deal with the issues instead of... SAAAAY.. the whole calling people anti-american because they're saying what everyone with at least quarter a tank of sense in their heads have allready figured out. I mean come on, there aren't many so someone has to tell them.
By , at 10:47 PM
You should learn a thing or two about the Dubai Ports World deal before you bloviate. or are you just a sucker for other grotesquely fat men that can't understand international politics or business?
By , at 1:27 AM
Some of you are missing the point with respect to patriotism.
Have a listen to "England My Home" by the Levellers -- it's on the LP "A Weapon Called the Word". Try to put aside the fact that it's about a country within the UK, and decide whether you think this is a song by someone who loves their country, or hates it.
Link to lyrics here.
I don't have a probklem with the fact that it's arabs. My problem is that it's a private company whose soul motivation is profits, not national security. If I'd known the British were doing it before, I'd have had a problem with that too. I don't have a problem with the Arabs at all since the whole "muslim terrorist epidemic" thing is made up. Sure, there are some, just as there are Christian terrorists in the US, but it's very very far from a national crisis. Even IF muslim terroists were involved in 9/11 without the authorization of the US government (which is a BIG BIG if when you look at the evidence) less Americans have died in the US in the past 20 years of foreign terrorism than of lightning strikes. Are we gonna have a war on stormclouds next?
By , at 5:41 AM
Woah, woah, woah!! NEVER claim to be a smart person, or to know what a smart person is, especially not on the internet! I won't do it; if I were that smart, I'd be making more than $9.10 an hour and would have people working for ME. Of couse, Curious George proves that you can be less than sensible and still hold national office through dozens of different scandals while pulling down about half a mil a year. That being said, I'm sure most of us on this blogger have a good shot at being supreme overlord of the earth...
By , at 6:34 AM
"I apologize on behalf of conservatives; since all liberals are afraid of muslims, eh? I suppose you'd be this afraid if it had been an egyptian company as well?
No! We absolutely cannot have allies in the middle east! They`re all muslim! And Muslims are dangerous! Right? Yeah, put those in your liberal talking points..."
It doesn't matter WHICH foreign country we're giving access to! Our national security is at risk. What I don't understand is why we have to have foreign countries owning our ports...ANY foreign countries! If it's a "money thing" that's causing this, then Bush should come up with the money that's needed out of his own pocket. When he took office, there was a surplus of money. Since then, he has put us in a tremendous amount of debt and it's all his fault. ONLY Americans should own and be in charge of our ports and our national security. Our forefathers made it clear that ONLY an American, born on American soil, can become President of the USA for national security reasons. I doubt that they knew then that an American born President would sell our ports out to companies/countries from all over the world. It's insane.
By , at 7:38 AM
Oh shi- a private company wants profits! IT IS OBVIOUSLY EVIL! :o
Where were you guys when Clinton sold China most of our National Debt?
By , at 9:34 AM
The bottom line is that, Michael Moore is a total asshole, and he and the guy that wrote that article obviously don't understand human psychology, or if they do they don't care and the purpose of the article isn't to make ammends or prove anything right, it's to rant so that the writer feels like a bigshot. If you rub something in someones face, it doesn't matter whether or not you have completely objective evidence to sugguest they're wrong: the chances of them admitting it is essentially null. By saying "Hey Republicans, we were right fuck you!" you're doing the same thing that they did to Michael Moore by calling him treasoneous. I mean, at least Michael Moore (who I consider unnessecarily radical) had the decency to go out on The Daily Show and proclaim that "No, the movie isn't fair." Doesn't mean it's not true, just means its a biased account.
Anyway, I seem to have gotten off track. The point is, the guy who said "calling the president on his bullshit isn't anti-American" is right, *if* it's bullshit. So the hard part is objectively defining it as bullshit. And you know what? Calling him on his bullshit even if it ISN'T bullshit isn't anti-american. C'mon people, even in the last election only around 52% (I think) of the American population voted for him. Democrats are allowed to be dissatisfied and just by the sheer virtue that they lost!
And another thing! What's with the Republican concept of being defensive from the "overpowering Democrats?" I don't care if you say "Oh, there's still checks and balances!" just because the Democrats have the power to delay or hold up bills through things as a fillabuster (which I seem to recall the republicanly dominated congress wanting to get rid of... whatever happened to that?); The Democrats can't create bills at all as it is! Well, assuming it's divided among party lines. Thank Beaver Jesus for centrists like John McCain, though I'm sure he'll be forced to run off and do something I don't like so that his party doesn't kick him out entirely. Bah!
Anyway, I'm a centrist, and I'd be ranting more about stupid democrats, but they're not the ones in power. Bottom line is, Republicans got the power, they're the ones that have to take the hits. With great power comes great mockability. Or something like that.
When we get Hillary Clinton in the office and she starts up some weird tax-and-spend politics where the taxes go into Beaver Dam Reconstruction funding or something, then I'll bitch about Democrats. But as long as the primary problem is with Republicans trying to utterly and completely squelch the legitimacy of the opposistion party and the arguements they present, without resorting to any form of logical recourse, well, it's pretty easy to pick sides.
That does not mean that I think all Democrats are right. Boy oh BOY does that not mean that. SHEESH! I mean, there are a bunch of quacks out there even worse than Bush. You just don't hear about them! Or I don't anyway.
By TheyCallMeTomu, at 9:36 AM
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
By TheyCallMeTomu, at 9:37 AM
It's not anti-American to disaprove of the President for any reason. But just like they can mock those in power, those in power can mock those not in power. :P Damn liberals.
By , at 12:52 PM
I liked that "Who's your daddy?"-part. That's what you get for letting religious people vote. You need a lot of faith to believe that someone who isn't known for self-sacrifice would choose 8 x 0.4 = 3.2 millions over 1,400 millions. ;)
By , at 1:41 PM
Didn't a certain 78 year-old lawyer recently come out of the hospital and appologize to a certain Vice President who shot him? A man appologized to the person who SHOT HIM! Trust me, TheyCallMeTomu, it's bullshit.
Always assume nothing.
Always question everything.
Always believe in something,
just not me.
- Infamous 370
By , at 6:36 PM
Is Sore Thumbs pro Gore, a subtle message in the art? The macabre storylines just keep coming... Also, two more things: I havn't registered because I fear my voice would be snuffed...and!!!!...
UPDATE THE CAST PAGE!!! (Yes, I'm the same guy whos been protesting this for the last 3 weeks.)
By , at 8:58 PM
You could just change your name to "Update the Cast Page." Then we would always know it's you.
By , at 7:30 PM
For the record, "tax and spend" SHOULD be the way government works. Not "Don't tax the rich, spend the country into bankrupcy (ie: a 9 trillion dollar debt)"
By , at 6:23 AM
>Where were you guys when Clinton sold China most of our National Debt?
Where were you when Bush sold them the rest of the country?
By , at 6:25 AM
Apologize to Michael Moore? For what? Being a fat mouthed dick?
Michael Moore is a moron, and it's pathetic that people think highly of such a disheveled, pompous, and hypocrtical piece of human filth. He's no better than Bush as far as I'm concerned... the only difference is that Bush isn't a lardass and is sold out to Saudi Arabia rather than the fanatical socialists.
I give no credit to anyone who endorses the words of a rampaging and screaming Benedict Arnold, like Al Gore.
How does it feel to be a liberal and have a ranting maniac like that speaking on your behalf, hm?
By , at 11:34 PM
I give no credit to anyone who endorses the words of a rampaging and screaming Benedict Arnold, like Al Gore.
How does it feel to be a liberal and have a ranting maniac like that speaking on your behalf, hm?
11:34 PM
By , at 7:58 PM
I give no credit to anyone who endorses the words of a rampaging and screaming Benedict Arnold, like Al Gore.
How does it feel to be a liberal and have a ranting maniac like that speaking on your behalf, hm?
11:34 PM
I dont think credit should be given to anyone who can not think about more than just what he can see. Perhaps you should take some time to consider what you are saying right now. Benedict Arnold is not a ranting maniac, nor is any conservative or liberal.
And also, if you were in bush's position, what would you choose? I think generally the temptations would be too great for the average person.
By , at 8:01 PM
Security is still in the hands of the US. Dubai only got the keys to the forklift, so to speak, from the british company that had handled it before. Besides the Mexican/US border is the real threat to the country. Why bother going through ports with tight security when you can hop the border like mexicans do successfully every day?
By , at 1:37 AM
i'm not really a major supporter of any party. a lot of you seem to think that because someone supports a certain party that means they're dumb. i've seen a lot of comments along the lines of "damn liberals" and the like. I was a liberal supporter for a while when i realised a lot of my friends were conservative. i'm not going to suddenly start hating them just because they think a different party is better. when it comes down to it, party doesn't really matter, just the intelligence of the individual. if they do something wrong, they get voted out anyway. What do policies of a party mean if the people are against it? the best leader is one who is willing to change his(or her) opinions and make the best discision for the situation. Moore should be commended for trying to put a stop to idiocy, even if he is dumb. if someone was trying to make a cure for cancer, would people make fun of him if he failed? i always operate under the assumption that people i meet are intelligent and nice people until i see evidence that shows otherwise. i suggest you people do the same. i'm jumping around a bit, but i hope a few people can sort out my jumbled writing style :P.
By , at 7:58 AM
News archives | 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 | 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 | 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 | 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 | 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 | 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 | 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 | 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 | 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 | 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 | 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 | 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 | 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 | 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 | 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 | 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 | 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 | 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 | 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 | 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 | 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 | 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 | 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 | 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 | 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 | 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 | 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 | 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 | 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 | 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 | 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 | 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 | 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 | 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 | 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 | 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 | 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 | 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 | 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 | 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 | 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 | 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 | 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 | 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 | 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 | 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 | 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 | 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008