, at
6:09 PM
Despicable.
- Infamous 370
By , at
6:09 PM
Why is it that every time I think humanity just may be improving, i see something like this that makes me think genocide is the only solution? I'd blame the media if it weren't so cliche'd and obvious. Damn the brothers Warner, damn them to hell.
By , at
10:12 PM
I would care, except I abandoned watching television actively years ago because of trite rehashes like this.
The bottom dollar, superhero merch is selling hot right now, might as well capitalize on the current trend...
By , at
12:35 AM
Lol, this is the second webcomic to mention this. If it were not for you guys where would I hear these things?
By , at
12:46 AM
Buzz Bunn is wrong on sooo many many levels. FIrstly, the blatant attempt (as darqkat said) to cash in on superhero trends - but didn't anyone point out:
a) Bugs is the most popular cartoon character in the past 70-odd years
b) his identity is a fully recognisable brand - if they want new characters - do a disney and introduce the futuristic nephew
c) recent trends last a few months before dying out - therefore all the millions spent in revamping will go straight down the pan (Looney Tunes didn't do this - how popular did Taz get then?)
d) and lastly, has anyone seen Watership Down and noticed the similarities??? Frankly if I was a kid I'd be more scared than anything
By , at
1:50 AM
What the fuck was that.
If a backwards talking hotdog vender got cancer and was leaving behind his wife and kids that he loves dearly and had the last wish of seeing the looney toons caracters craped out and molded into shit caractiures of what they were. i would have to denie that man the right and for good measure would be forced to eat his children
Dude, they own them, they can do whatever they want with them. They don't owe you anything and never will. You were on the bitch end of their thrust of genious begging for more.
Art does not owe anybody anything ever, except sometimes money. That's how it works.
By , at
4:04 AM
This is the kind of situation that calls for 'stop raping my childhood!'
Now, let's start taking bets on the slash pairings. Buzz/Duck, anyone?
-K
By , at
5:32 AM
Sure WB own the characters and can do whatever they want with them. But it doesn't make it a good idea to make Bugs Bunny and his posse "Xtreme."
By , at
5:41 AM
I think it is funny.
I believe WB is parodying the superhero genre using the characters we grown to like to do so. That's what they do.
Remember Duck Dogers anyone?
The characters and stories are evolving with their time, and there's nothing wrong with that. They could make a new cartoon with Sam as a desperado... but would it have the same appeal today?
The media itself is evolving. Sorry, but I don't like most of the Looney Tunes. They have no plot. It's always about Character #1 trying to catch character #2 and failing, and usually getting injured in the process. Even kids today would grow tired of this.
Instead, these days they give us more complex stories with up-to-date animation techniques.
Change is life. Stagnancy is death. Get used to change.
By , at
6:14 AM
Curl up and die!
By , at
8:13 AM
meh... I personally would have left the classic characters alone, but that's not my choice in this case. I just wonder if the series will be any good whatsoever... probably not. Oh well, que sera sera.
By , at
8:15 AM
I give this piece of crap twelve epidodes tops, and maybe a bad PS2 game...
- Infamous 370
By , at
8:15 AM
Seriously, what were video games invented for if not to give us an escape from all this crap? What's the point of the none-realistic, over-used plots that we see repeated every day? Hasn't anyone grown tired of seeing different people do the exact same thing on every channel? Like I said, video games were invented with good reason.
By , at
9:39 AM
What the...
By , at
10:47 AM
This is pathetic, this is even more pathetic than disney and their need to make bad sequels to every single cartoon. Warner hasn't made a decent cartoon since they ruined Pinky and the Brain by making it Pinky, Elmyra and the Brain.
By , at
10:58 AM
. . . I think I'm going to cry now.
By , at
11:42 AM
Bugs is not dead yet. he still lives. I swear.
By , at
4:50 PM
Anyone who thinks that the Loonatics are somehow "replacing" the old Looney Tunes is a complete and total moron.
By , at
8:50 PM
Bugs Bunny finally grew up. Get over it, doc.
By , at
1:14 AM
You see, you people have no idea what you're talking about. Those shows were good when they came out and you liked them, but you still think you gotta' bitch and moan.
You're the only people who will watch this piece of garbage, because you're still obsessed with the characters. They will never make new Merry Melodies (I like more from the title anyway) and they may never make another good Simpsons episode, but why complain about it?
They can't go back to making them the way they were, it's already been done. If you're so smart, then you write a good Loony Toons movie or series. You're not being forced to watch it, so, what do you care if bad television is made?
By , at
1:17 AM
I liked the Incredibles, and with that female narrator and her "few phone calls" this looked like a blatant rip-off without the emotional stuff. Or a parody - hard to say without having seen an actual episode. Either way I don't see the harm. The old cartoons will always remain classics, and has anyone officially announced that the old Bugs Bunny is no more in the WB cartoon universe? Or is Bugs Bunny some kind of sacred bunny who should never be tampered with? And here I thought he was all about irreverence! :)
By , at
11:09 AM
Ew. Ew. Ew.
It's times like these when I'm GLAD I don't watch TV.
By , at
12:59 PM
Obviously, this entire fiasco is indicative of a... ooh look! A boob!
By , at
3:18 PM
Give it up, no, it's not terribly original, but then few shows are anymore. Kids now are more attracted to "flashy" stuff, that's why pokemon became so "in" for a while, then Yugioh, bright colors, sharp image, etc.
I'd probably watch an episode to see how it turned out, It's stupid to bash something without even looking at it, it's kinda like people calling Goths Santanists, saying communism is evil, etc. It's un-educated.
WB has probably analized the market and figured this was worth a shot, Good for em. I'm pretty sure that folks though original BB was garbage compared to their kids TV shows.
I'm done ranting now.
By , at
8:54 PM
Dude, they can make a show like that if they have to, but what reason is there to name the characters after historical cartoon characters that they have little actual relation to? If kids today don't enjoy Looney Tunes, what do they expect to gain from it? If kids do enjoy Looney Tunes, then why don't they make cartoons that are like Looney Tunes?
It's stupid. I doubt they're going to gain adult audiences by butchering childhood memories.
By , at
12:32 AM
OH MY GAWD... they CAN'T be serious about this. Its gonna make Space Jam and that other loony tunes movie look like Masterpiece Theatre. What crackhead green-lighted this?
By , at
2:03 AM
Hey, if you listen closely you can actually hear the crackling of the smoldering pile of ash that once was my childhood.
By , at
5:59 AM
So, lemme get this straight! You're acting all cranky because you're nostalgic... about Looney Tunes?
God damn, was I the only kid that actually had *taste*?
By , at
7:45 AM
Yes, our mediocre taste in cartoons as 5 year olds just serves as testament to your awesomely superior cartoon critiquing ability. Surely Warner Bros. had unknowingly made a mistake by keeping Looney Tunes around for all these years. Boy, I sure do wish I hadn't wasted my childhood watching horrible cartoons like Looney Tunes. Good thing you managed to dodge that bullet.
By , at
9:02 AM
Looks like a good idea to me. They're combining the familiar Loony Toons characters with a futuristic superhero genre. They will have the ability to draw initial interest from a broad group of people.
The most difficult thing involved in creating a new show, particularly one that is significantly different from anything else out there is attracting the initial audience. Warner Brothers has obviously found a way around that by creating these new characters as the artistic descendants of the Loony Toons characters that we all grew up with.
Instant audience. It doesn't guarantee success, but it does give them a chance.
By , at
9:34 AM
HRRRRRGH... Ahhhh...
Well, I'm done making the first 15 episodes of that show, someone hand me the paper.
By , at
10:40 AM
Hey Mr. Post-Distinguished-Kiddy man, what were these tasteful cartoons that you enjoyed? A bit of Transformers perhaps? Astro Boy? Loony Tunes is one of the few cartoons of the past that hasn't dated. It remains enjoyable even without nostalgia, and that's why repeats have persisted so long. Not even Mickey Mouse has been enjoyed over such a range of time.
By , at
11:11 AM
my god.. can't the WB leave anything alone.. i mean seriously.. how intresting is that really? Why not just make new characters? -_-
I'd be significantly more upset by this if "reimagining" the looney toons hadn't been WB standard for years now.
Tiny Toons
Baby Loony Toons
Space Jam
Remember back around 95 - 95 when all those jerseys came out with Bugs, Taz and anyone else they could fit on it dressed up like they were ready to do a drive by?
these all come and go and truth be told in the long run most people barely remember then a few years later.
Tiny Toons was actually decent though, and still paid homage to the original characters without mutating them into- well, something like this. Bad enough WB's last effort was a pure rip off of Muppet Babies. This is even sadder.
Bugs isn't rolling in his grave, but rest assured, the men who originally created and voiced these characters are.
By , at
6:09 PM
sigh, have any of you actually seen this show? Maybe you should before you judge it.. It may seem a little sad on the offset, but it might be an enjoyable experience.. you never know
By , at
7:09 PM
You idiots, they're not changing the old characters for the benefit of the show. They're making new characters that are similar to old characters. They don't even have the same names- it's BUZZ Bunny, not Bugs. How is there any cause for complaint?
By , at
9:18 PM
these are not new characters. Tiny Toons had new characters. These are simply fucked-up futuristic versions of the old ones. Shit... in the trailer it showed a group shot of the original characters before the ink washed over them and turned them into these "Loonatics"
Also, anyone who insults someone else's taste because they like the Loony Tunes is a fucking moron. If you can watch Wabbit of Seville and then say to my face that it wasn't a work of art, I'll take your eyes out with a rusty spoon.
One last thing. For the record, no one had to see the Haunted fucking Mansion to tell that it was a shit
By 
EsotericWombat, at
11:29 PM
Mel Blanc. He was the voice guy.
and I Freeling, Chuck Jones, and a few others that don't spring instantly to mind are also responsible for the earlier, brilliant Looney Tunes.
By , at
11:32 PM
They're not the same characters. They look different, they have different personalities, they have different names, it is explicitly stated that they are in fact ancestors of the original characters. I doubt they mean "ancestors" in the sense that "the son is the father of the man."
By , at
2:54 AM
Let's take a moment and count the past Looney Toons spin-offs, shall we?
1) Tiny Toons Adventures
2) Animaniacs
3) Sylvester and Tweety Mysteries
4) Duck Dodgers
5) Baby Looney Tunes
I'm not counting things like "The Bugs and Daffy Show", which basically showed the original cartoons with new openings and such. (I also may be missing one or two, correct me if I have.)
Out of all those spin-offs, how many were downright godawful? I can count one, Baby Looney Tunes.
Just on the basis of their track record, I'll give Loonatiks a fair shot to hook me.
Also, when I first saw the preview I immediately thought "Bucky O'Hare + Space Usagi = Loonatiks". Come on, a green rabbit with a gun-happy duck sidekick, who's the descendant of a famous character? What else could it be but the bastard child of those two (admittedly cool) ideas?
Bah. Google Buzz Bunny. Laugh.
How successful will the show be when the little kiddies look for images of their new hero?
hee. hee. hee.
By , at
5:33 AM
It's no different than George Lucas f**ing up the classic that was Star Wars. OK, Return of the Jedi actually made up for the mess that was The Empire Strikes Back. But The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones were just dire. At least TPM had some pace to it, never giving the viewer sufficient time to question the gaping holes in the plot. And anytime the pace did let up, my thoughts turned straight to Jar Jar Binks' dysthanasia.
The 'Toons were fine as they were. Even the stories didn't become terribly out-of-date, because the writers mostly knew what would stand the test of time {WWII specials, racism and a few in-jokes being the exception}. Star Wars was fine. Sure it was based on an existing mythology, but at least it was a mythology that few people among the intended audience had studied in depth {unlike, say Greek, Roman and Jewish mythology, which have been done to death in films.} The point is they weren't broken. They didn't need fixing.
By , at
6:36 AM
Looney Tunes was ruined way back when they introduced Lola Bunny. That's when the show went from random slapstick violent humor to "OMGZ GURL POWR LOLZ SPORTZ R KOOL" politically correct garbage.
By , at
9:00 AM
Random:
Q: Why would you point your finger at the customer?
A: To show off your l337 foreshortening skillz, of course. ;)
By , at
12:04 PM
No joke, i just cried. And Im not even trying to be cute or anything. That makes me sick to my stomach. God, Batman, ok, Superman, sure, Spiderman, alright, but Loony Toons? C'mon.
By , at
1:11 PM
you know, i'm kinda bitter about this too, it's never fun to see a childhood icon be messed with, but you have to think of the target audience. it's the KID'S WB, as in kids who will be drawn to this stuff. i'm actually thinking that quite a few adults will be checking it out too, if only the first episode.
but have you thought of the bright side? the original WB characters have kinda of fallen out of the public view as of late, kids aren't as exposed to the beauty that is Looney Toons, perhaps this new revamped version will perk their interest in the old stuff as well? even if it is just listening to older people complain about how it's changed, they're still going to be exposed to the old Looney Toons.
i'm just sayin....
By , at
1:37 PM
AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!! MY EYES!!!!!! THEY BUUUUUUUUUURN!!!!!! IT'S WORSE THAN WHEN THAT GUY FROM THE GODFATHER SAW THE DISMEMBERED HEAD OF HIS PRIZED HORSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By , at
3:25 PM
The funny hing is when you Google Buzz Bunny and realise that it is, in actual fact, a vibrator.
I kid you not.
By , at
4:47 AM
Heh, heh! I wonder how many lawsuits we'll see because of this...
By , at
5:02 PM
I saw this a couple days ago.... its horrible, to think what they'd do to characters that generations of kids grew up with, just to make some quick money. If Bugs Bunny's spinning in his grave, I hope he comes out and kicks the president of WB's ass.
that guy doesnt know what he's messing with.
By , at
12:19 PM
Im just gonna say this: you people that think the complaints are moronic, shut it. Whatever, WB owns Loony Toons, for better or worse, but if something is around long enough, it becomes puvlic property. I grew up with 'Toons, its given America the baises of all animated comedy. Loony Toons are not a force to be fucked with. It's compareable to the desendants of Da Vinci redrawing the Mona Lisa because it no longer "appeals" to todays aduiances. I for one am angry that this is allowed to happen, it is representitive of the drying pool of imagination in our country. If people who are PAID to write plots and make new charctors cannot do this and are forced to revamp old and beloved icons to make a buck, where will future generations learn diversity of thought. It's beginning to look like all media shall become the same and only able to parrot back what has been done already. Take a stand writers! Make your own ideas and publish them! Let thought guide your hand instead of looking to what there is for ideas! History will never be made by repeating what we see every day. Thank you.
By , at
6:22 PM
But the show doesn't mess with the old cartoons. That rabbit in the show is not Bugs Bunny, it's BUZZ Bunny. That road runner isn't Road Runner, it's Roadster Runner. That Tasmanian Devil isn't Taz Devil, it's Spaz Devil. How is this any worse than making a show about pre-teen furries called Buster Bunny, Dizzy Devil, etc.?
By , at
8:40 PM
You know what, when I heard somebody took the sprites from final fantasy 1 and turned them into a comic were they were all warped into idiots, I was kinda pissed too and I wanted to kick his ass for screwing with my all time favorite video game.
That comic is 8-bit theater and I love it now. And you know what, I was never going to read it because I was offended that he could even consider such a thing.
And the lesson to learn here is that even though they are ass-raping your favorite characters of all time, doesn't necessarily mean the show will be bad.
It does look likely that it will be a horrid show I'll admit, but I've learned to give things a chance before judging it.
By , at
9:19 AM
This is pure Sh!t.
By , at
10:40 AM
The difference between this and 8-bit, though, is that 8-bit is a parody - it's meant to take a game, and make fun of it. This "buzz bunny" thing is taking a classic show, completely changing it's genre, and hoping that they can make money off of brand recognition, despite it not having anything to do with the original from which it drew inspiration.
I wouldn't have a problem with the show if it were a comedy, same as the first; I wouldn't have a problem if the original was an action show, and this was a parody of it; heck, I wouldn't have a problem if the original was a show with some vague continuity, and this was supposed to have somehow been drawn from that - but, to the best of the information that I have seen, it just took an old classic, and for no apparent reason, decided to make it into a radically different show for no apparent reason. Yes, I know the characters were different - but in choosing to base the character models and names off of the originals, they have still made them related enough that I can take offense.
What's sad is that I didn't even like the originals that much... Slapstick was never really my thing, and looney toons used a lot of it.
By , at
12:31 PM
Sure, it looks pretty dumb...but Loony Tunes has been doing the exact same thing for the past several years, and creative stagnation can be just as bad as ridiculous changes.
By , at
3:22 PM
Is there any classic series that hasn't been rehashed for quick cash in the last ten years? Ten bucks says that the Jetsons are next...
- Infamous 370
By , at
5:55 PM
Wait. I'm sorry. Most of you probably liked Batman Beyond right? That was an updated concept of an old character, right?
"But that was a new character! It was Terry McGinnis, not Bruce Wayne!"
Guess what, they're making it a point to be sure to show that these are not the same characters we've grown up with.
I sincerely doubt that WB will be changing the complete formula of a working series. Hell, they haven't even specified if this is going to be comedy or action/drama. It might be both, it might be neither.
Stop clinging to your childhood memories as the last bastion of hope in a world that you think is against you.
By Christopher Kennedy, at
7:19 PM
Yeah, just hop in your time machine and go back the 1940s and you can watch all the original cartoons from your childhood (that's how old your are, right?) and we'll all be happy.
Again, things do not become public property when they are owned by a company. They become public property in the way that they can be made fun of without violating copyright laws, but the company that owns the likeness and the characters most certainly can do whatever the hell they want with it. Don't watch it if you don't like it, christ and quit your fucking bitching. I hope that they come out with a series where Bugs Bunny is a serial rapist in a negative utopia filled with radioactive hellspawn armed with butterfly cannons... from hell, yo. To the extreme.
By , at
3:57 AM
Flintstones, they're the Flinstones, they're the modern super action style (insert guitar riff) familyyyyy!
That's whats next.
And everyone does realize that even if it never gets beyond one episode this show is going to have a stupid PS2 game made of it, right?
By , at
5:40 AM
BLASPHEMY
By , at
11:25 AM
Kill da wabbit!
By , at
6:35 PM
why do they insist on killing our childhood and when can we reciprocate the favor by killing thme??!!?!?!?!?1
By , at
8:47 PM
There is a huge-ass difference between 'updated' and 'mangled.' In this case specifically, the Looney Tunes are comedy. Slapstick comedy. Based entirely around several different variations of the word 'silly'. Space Jam, Animaniacs, Tiny Toons, all of those other spinoffs understood that.
This, this is not silly. This? OMG The World Is In Danger. Demolitions? Disguises? Martial arts expert? Laser eyes. The leader has LASER EYES. If this were a parody, that'd be great. But... it's not. It's a superhero flick. Aaaand, it looks to be a really bad one all by itself, even without the promise accrued through ripping vague character templates from an entirely different genre of cartooning.
By , at
10:12 PM
Talk about missing the left turn at Albuquerque.
By , at
12:54 AM
(Sigh!) I guess it's not their fault that they're so old and out of touch that they can't come up with any decent and/or original ideas any more. This is just another sign, like all of the other good/bad remakes/parodies that we have seen lately, or the last two/first two Star Wars films. We used to leave the house to experience the world, now we have television in our cars and our cell phones because we're so obsessed with 'Survivor 'and 'Desparate Housewives'. Desparate is right... All signs that it's time for some new creative minds to step forward and submit their ideas before we all get so bored with television that we resort to spending time with our families...
Let's just face the fact that as long as people are willing to accept contribed bullshit, it will be perfectly okay and incredibly profitable to package, market and distribute it. It might be the umteenth pokemon movie, it might be the latest, so-called psycological thriller, it could be the next Lunatics, or even a Curious George diplomatic mission to Europe... No matter how you dress it up, bullshit is bullshit, and the sooner we all learn to notice the smell, the better.
Also, this is entirely unrelated, but did anyone else see the recent collosal international fuck-up on NBC? I watched Brian William's report for a bit, then I flipped over to CNN a little later... I couldn't stop laughing for an hour after I realized it! Who says reality isn't as entertaining as reality television? Who says that the Daily Show is the only news show that gets it wrong first? No one writer could ever create something this entertaining...
Always assume nothing.
Always question everything.
Always believe in something,
just not me.
- Infamous 370
By , at
8:04 AM
Whoever keeps saying "ITS NOT THE SAME CHARACTERS! ITS BUZZ BUNNY!"
You stupid stupid turd.
I think all the people who dont think it matters so much really need to shut the hell up and think about things they love. If you love to drink pepsi, what if they came out with a new drink with a nice taste of PISS, called it Pepsi-Z (not pepsi! ITS NOT THE SAME!) and then replaced pepsi with it.
By , at
10:50 AM
They're not replacing the old cartoons. You will always be able to watch the old cartoons. Your analogy is flawed.
By , at
11:32 AM
I would like to share some perspective. This past christmas, as a stocking stuffer my nephew received a Bugs Bunny Keychain. When asked what it was, with a completely detached manner this was his response: " ummm, a rabbit with a carrot." Now my nephew is 7 years old. Certainly old enough to identify a character. When my sister and I heard this we were both shocked, and its her kid! The Looney Toons as we know them are a part of our past. Children today aren't interested. Granted, slapstick comedy will never die as long as we have toddlers. But, turning something with name recognition into something totally new, is sound business practice. Oh, and incidentally, "the superhero thing" isn't exactly a fad. Voltron anyone? Spiderman. The Original X-Men cartoon. A decade plus ceases to be a fad.
By , at
1:47 PM
This is what would have happened had Bugs taken the left at albequirquie (or however the hell you spell it)
Seriously though. It doesn't look TOO awful, it might be good. Hell, I like Teen Titans and I hate most of DC with a righteous passion. My problem was, in the preview, I couldn't tell the damn difference from Buzz and whoever Wile E. turned into
By , at
1:58 PM
Did you just say voltron O.o?
That was HORRIBLE. Even without it being a blantant attempt to capitalize on the Power Rangers trend (btw, the new one 'SPD' I have that on my computer in the original japanese O.o If they don't keep Doggie Krueger (his actual name) I'm gonna whoop some ass) it's still horrible.
By , at
2:01 PM
First, the superhero thing isnt a fad, as the person before me pointed out, but twisting old charactors into mangled charicatures of what they once were is.
Second, how can you laugh at the NPC screw up? I agree it is humorous until you realize TWO PEOPLE DIED! AND A THIRD HAS LOST HIS ANONYMITY SO ANY WHACO SADDAM FANATIC CAN FIND AND KILL HIM! and with that off my chest...
Batman Beyond sucked total ass, but im a hypocrite cuase i like Teen Titans...Go plucky side-kicks!
By , at
5:49 PM
Voltron predates Power Rangers, but the quality and chronology of the show is beside the point.
By , at
3:28 AM
Yeah, I'd have to agree with what your were saying about media fuck-ups and how it's related to reality television. The world isn't that bad of the place, but what really screws it up is little pieces of shit obsessing about every little detail and not getting off their mustard stained fat asses and doing something with their lives.
It's not CNN's fault, it's every dipshit sitting around watching CNN so they can feel like they have something relivant to say when they post on a blog or talk to their group of loser friends who like to think their political and the vanguard of public opinion. Everyone needs to quit their bitching in general and get a life. Politics isn't interesting and it it's only funny if you're trying to impress someone equally worthless as yourself.
By , at
5:03 AM
Ouch. I guess it's true that Anonymous doesn't forgive...
Politics is not interesting? It's your choice to be interested or not, but are you saying you don't care how the world works? Politics are a big part of how things get done internationally, everything else depends on the time, the place and the people involved.
Nitpicking at every little detail of life is a waste of time? Well, some of us like to think about things other than those involved in our so-called 'pathetic lives'. People like to take the time to learn about other things outside their respective corners of the world, because sometimes life sucks no matter where you are. Some people like the idea of stopping and thinking 'Hey, doing this sucks shit, but this over here sucks a little less shit...'
By the way, I never did understand the mindset of people who tell others to 'get a life'. It's not always so easy, especially when it costs so much to live... Also, I always wonder what these poor people are going through that makes them feel that they have to belittle others... I guess it's easier to criticize and demean someone than to offer them advice or help.
Oh, and as for the condition of my ass, you left out 'hairy', by the way.
Always assume nothing.
Always question everything.
Always believe in something,
just not me, and always remember to think, it's what separates us from the animals, and anonymous.
- Infamous 370
By , at
9:05 PM
Na, more what I'm talking about is that it's destructive for uninformed people to want their misinformation "now, now, now" and the short attention span of armchair punits. It's takes more time to understand something partially and pretty much a lifetime to understand anything fully.
What I'm saying is that the whole debactle with the Iraqi judge was is a symptom of a greater problem with people's wish to appear inform rather than actually being informed.
As for getting a life, that is advice and I think it would make the person's life and the world a better place if they took said advice. "Getting a life" might include something that you base on politics or something you took the time to understand. Such as, doing mission or humanitarian work. Or it might be as simple as getting a job so you're not a burden to society, or even spending time with your children so they don't turn into tremendous fuck-ups. I think what you're confusing with my statement is that I've said "getting a life" would be something like going to a club, getting blasted then "slam-dunking" some hoochie-mama with big tits.
I'm sure you agree with me entirely, but you've taken offense to my chosen mode of emotion, but it was meant to be said in vain, because idiots won't take good advice anyway.
By , at
3:56 AM
As another side note, I'm bothered by how outragously and obviously wrong the prominate figuers of America are and how stupidly polarized Americans think they are now.
I think the real problem is that the American people have given up so many of their rights, that we elect rulers now and not servants. America is ruled by law and the constitution not rulers or was.
The American public has be duped by the two political parties into thinking that one or the other will do something for them or protect them (from other nations or even other political parties), so that they won't fight to take back the rule of law and justice and limit the powers of our elected officials.
By , at
4:15 AM
it wouldn't be that bad if they didn't look so creepy. If they looked close to the same, it might be cool.
Shut the Fuck up you bunch of winey lil bitches, its jus a fucking show, go eat a twinky!
By , at
12:37 AM
News archives | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008